Monthly Archives: March 2006

Backdated post. Originally posted on my deviantART page.
Edited on January 11, 2008.

Finally! Finally I can bring this to a close. After a series of self-torture (watching Roger Moore trying to act) and a few ups and downs between Timothy Dalton and Pierce Brosnan, I have now, finally, the bragging rights to say that I have seen every official James Bond movie. The conclusions I have come to draw regarding the last two Bonds surprise even myself.

I have realised there is one factor which is hard to.. factor in, so to speak. A movie is like a fine wine, you can say. It’s goodness depends on when you drink.. or when you watch it, really. Many movies seem good the year they come out, but when you watch them again years later, it can sometimes surprise you.

Moonraker (1979)

Rated: 6/10

This movie surprised me in many ways. It actually led me to believe that ol’ Roger boy was getting better at being a Bond. This, however, was short-lived, as Bond ended up going into space. It makes me want to believe they just wanted to ‘borrow’ some of Star Wars’ glory, which was released just 2 years before this. Can’t blame them though, and I won’t, since everyone probably wanted more of it in the movies.

Still, the acting was mediocre as expected, but everything and everyone else was pretty good (especially Jaws), up until the space part. When things go over the top, they tend to go downhill. Other than all this, there isn’t much to say about Moonraker. Sad to see Jaws go though…

For Your Eyes Only (1981)

Rated: 7/10

First Moore movie to get more than a 6 on actual merit. This movie genuinely did not suck. This movie not only had a plausible plot, but it actually had a twist. That’s right, a plot twist in a Bond movie. Shocking.

What’s better is that the Bond chick was actually pretty and not some bimbo, and she wasn’t a sucky actress either. And Moore, unlike always, didn’t sabotage the plot! This is probably his prime as a Bond. Hoped it would last.. we’ll see. Oh, what is this movie about? You’re gonna have to check that out yourself.

Octopussy (1983)

Rated: 7/10

This can’t be the writers. It must be the generation gap. The moment the 80s struck, Moore got better, seriously. Well not him, but the plots.

Honestly, the Connery Bond was killed when Moore took over, but this movie kept him from rolling in his grave. The plot was plausible, interesting, and the bit that gave this movie it’s passing grade: one punch line that wasn’t lamer than an Inca corpse. When in India, James Bond was sitting in the back of a little buggie driven by an Indian friend. Just then they are chased by the enemy and as they are about to shoot, they say this:

Bond: Vijay, we have company
Vijay: Don’t worry, this is a company car

He smiles and revs the buggie, does a wheelie and speeds off. That scene alone just made my day. The rest of the movie is quite interesting too. One Moore flick I’d recommend.

A View To A Kill (1985)

Rated: 5/10

Well it couldn’t have lasted, nor did it. The plot is made obvious from the start and it doesn’t get better. Madman wants to destroy Silicon Valley. A plot so simple you can sum it up into a tabloid headline. Seriously, there isn’t anything else to add to it. I think this movie was just another reason to see Cristopher Walken shoot people like a madman. Actually he plays the madman in this one.

Oh, and who could forget the “lovely” Grace Kelly. My goodness, she is one flat-chested flat-assed ugly motherfucker. I typically use ‘bitch’ when referring to females I dislike, but she is just one ugly motherfucker in that movie. Seeing her bare ass in all it’s infamous glory was the scene that killed baby Jesus. There is one, and only one compensation though: this is the last of the Roger Moore films. Thank your god now.

The Living Daylights (1987)

Rated: 7/10

Not a bad debut for probably the best Bond since Connery. This is what I call a true Cold War film. Good plot, good plot twist, good actors.. kinda, and good endings. I may have found this movie better than it really was, because it was a real relief from the ‘plot sabotaging’ Moore Bond. They really did strip this Bond of every characteristic Moore contributed to the Bond series. His unfathomable knowledge which comes from nowhere, his so-called slutty charm, his lame-ass corny punch lines. EVERYTHING. Dalton did not fail.

Of the many factors that make a movie good, there was one important one that was in his favour and one that seriously wasn’t. Dalton isn’t Bond. His broad face isn’t Bond. As much as he sounds like it and acts like it, he doesn’t look like it. The factor in his favour? The movie was made for him. The script was.. it’s as if it was custom-made for him. That seamlessness is exactly what cancelled the previous factor out. He rocks, Moore sucks.

Licence To Kill (1989)

Rated: 6/10

This movie was a victim in all sorts of ways. 1989 was a very interesting year, not only in history but in Hollywood as well. Let me just start by listing the factors.

First of all, this is the first Bond movie that wasn’t based on any of Ian Fleming’s novels or short stories. This was written by Michael G. Wilson, one of producers that worked with Albert R. Broccoli, lord and master of the Bond movies. Second of all, Wilson was forced to finish the screenplay all alone because of the strike by the Writers Guild of America. It prevented the co-writer Richard Maibaum from participating in the writing of the rest.

Finally, the already mediocre film, which was typically 80s by the way, had to compete with some of the biggest blockbusters of the 80s. It was in fact one of the most profitable summers in Hollywood. The other movies were Batman; Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade; Lethal Weapon 2; Honey, I Shrunk the Kids; Ghostbusters II; and Parenthood. Some of these were obviously heavy competition (others just sucked horribly).

The ending was a bit sucky, but all in all the movie was.. watchable. It’s also a shame that it wouldn’t have been another 6 years before the next Bond movie was made. This was due to a conflict about ownership rights and the like, and although Dalton was to make another Bond movie in 1991 which actually was based on a Fleming short story, he decided to take his leave in favour of better projects. I suppose he couldn’t wait around for the ownership shit to be sorted.

GoldenEye (1995)

Rated: 4/10

The beginning of the end. Or so it seems. They say that the previous movie wasn’t as popular as the older ones and they are probably right about that. Though this must have panicked the new producers, daughter and stepson of the late Mr Broccoli. What they came up with was a half-assed introduction to the new M, the new crew at MI6 and a pretty much half-assed plot to boot. This movie is an example of what happens when bad movies happen to good actors.

Let’s start off with the half-assed intro to Judi Dench, the new M. They make it as simplistic as possible. “I’m the new M”. There. How about the new Moneypenny? They replace her like we didn’t really notice. Who’s the new black guy? No one knows. It’s likely you don’t even know his name. Even more so, you probably don’t even know who I’m talking about. Try Google Images for Colin Salmon.

A whole reshuffle.. that’s nice. That’s not the bad part of the movie though. Boris is. Boris. How can one insignificant supporting actor who has little to no dialogue ruin a whole movie? Watch and see.

Tomorrow Never Dies (1997)

Rated: 7/10

The birth of the Brosnan Bond. Unlike the half-assed attempt to bring back the “Cold War” feel to the Bond films, this one actually manages to bring Bond to the new era. It also shows the world what kind of Bond Brosnan really is. This movie.. is actually good.

Plausible story, which is what we all hope for from the Bond series; a decent plot, which is what we all want from any movie; and finally decent acting. As for the rest of it.. nothing much to add. I suppose this one passes off as “just another Bond movie”.

The World Is Not Enough (1999)

Rated: 8/10

This movie, in some respects, is similar to the previous one. Having gotten over the ‘grand reshuffle’ of MI6, this is somewhat indeed just another Bond movie. One exception which gave it the good grade: M gets involved. This is something none of the previous Bond movies dared to do. They broke the static mould of having James Bond go out, get laid and save the world, and decided to bust M out of the “stiff” shell. M is no longer that person sitting behind the desk in the office of impervious doors. M gets involved, gets captured and.. the grand part.. saves herself.

In short, the movie is the best Brosnan Bond movie out there. Other than trying to pass off Denise Richards as someone with nuclear capabilities, that was compensated by the sexy Sophie Marceau. All in all it rocked my socks, end of story.

Die Another Day (2002)

Rated: 4/10

No. No no no. NO! NO! The movie sucked. Hard. And long. And I am here to tell you why.

Madonna’s theme for the movie is not a Bond theme. It’s another synth-pop techno-esque half-shit song that belongs nowhere other than Robyn’s shelf. It’s not a Bond theme. If that didn’t fuck it up, her actual appearance in the movie didn’t do any better. I’m just glad it was short.

Next to that, the bit that made the movie suck a donkey-monkey hybrid’s testicles for 32 hours straight without a coffee break, was not the plot actually. The plot was good, up to the ending. What made it suck was the utter BOMBARDMENT of special effects. I would swear to god if I believed in one, you’d think Steven Spielberg and George Lucas were drunk and on crack and LSD while working or playing with the world’s most powerful special effects software. Every fucking 5 minutes you would see an act of god, or blasphemy for that matter, as the movie makers decided to rapingly impregnate the scene with yet MORE special effects. This is the apocalypse of special effects that not all of the Star Wars films, the Star Trek series, the Stargate series, the Farscape series, ET, the War Of The Worlds, the Lord Of The Rings series, the X-Files series, the Matrix series, including the Animatrix, COMBINED could and would never have accumulated to, even if the lives everyone and everything in the universe (including the parallel ones) depended on it. Fuck, not quantum physics could explain that shit! Another special effect and they would have been better off making the movie in 3D. Fucking hell!

Preceded by Bond Galore 1.

Backdated post. Originally posted on my deviantART page.
Edited on January 11, 2008.

As you may have guessed, this has something to do with Bond. James Bond. For the last two weeks I’ve been trying to watch one Bond movie a day. So far I’ve managed to see at least half of them. After watching so many Bond movies, it’s understandable that there are things to be said about them and that is what this section will be about.

Dr. No (1962)

Rated: 5/10
Doctor No is the first of the Bond films and stars Sean Connery as Bond. Doctor No takes place in Jamaica and is about Dr. No wanting to sabotage American missile launches.

In this movie Connery truly is the stereotypical Bond as we know him. This is, of course, because he had set the example for all Bonds to come. The reason I have this film a mere 5 is because the plot was weaker than a Scooby Doo episode and it had hardly satisfied my cinematographic appetite, as most films of the 60s have.

From Russia With Love (1963)

Rated: 6/10
From Russia With Love is the second Bond movie and was based partly in Venice, but mostly in Turkey and the Balkans. In this film, SPECTRE plays both a Russian agent and Bond, tricking them into stealing some decoder.

This movie is substantially better than its predecessor in the sense that the plot is, well.. a plot and the action is better than the simple fight scenes of the previous film. Plus, the Russian agent is a babe.

Goldfinger (1964)

Rated: 6/10
I pity the fool who hasn’t seen Goldfinger. Even if you haven’t, you must have heard of it. Goldfinger is about a particular Auric Goldfinger wanting to control the world’s gold supply, of course. The reason for it’s fame, however, is because of a particular name that sticks with any man (or lesbian) who has seen the movie: Miss Pussy Galore.

Not much to add though. The plot was crisp and clear, straightforward and all the synonyms thereof. The film is a bit mediocre in my opinion, but I do have high expectations and old films don’t quite cut it for me. It’s the first I can truly call “good”.

Thunderball (1965)

Rated: 5/10
If the title didn’t throw you off, the ending will, though I won’t spoil that. In this movie, Dr Largo of SPECTRE hijacks a jet and steals bombs thereof. Fifteen minutes into the movie, you’ll see that this is the movie Mike Meyers chose to make his spoof from (Austin Powers).

The film itself took too long to get interesting, filling the time with random encounters with the bad guys, much like an episode of Power Rangers. As if that wasn’t disappointing enough, as I mentioned before, the ending was a load of bollocks and very unsatisfying. I won’t say this is the worst Bond movie, particularly since we haven’t gotten to Roger Moore yet.

You Only Live Twice (1967)

Rated: 6/10
This film’s plot is simple rather than simplistic. Here SPECTRE yet again, with Dr Blofeld (also in From Russia With Love) try to pit the superpowers of the world against each other by stealing something important. This film was mostly filmed in Japan.

The film isn’t completely disappointing, though it’s hardly the better of Connery’s films. It is however the penultimate. Reason for its rating: lamest attempt ever to make Sean Connery.. to make anyone look Asian with make-up.

On Her Majesty’s Secret Service (1969)

Rated: 8/10
This is George Lazenby’s first, only and last appearance as Agent 007. According to some sources, many fans of the Bond novels say that he was probably the best Bond ever, nailing the exact description in the books. Many fans of the films, however, say that he wasn’t as good as Connery, admittedly a tough act to follow, and probably flopped the whole series. This isn’t true at all.

There is a persistent belief that this film was a poor performer at the box office, or even that it was an actual flop. This is not true; it was actually the second highest grossing film worldwide of 1969, being outgrossed only by the mega-hit film Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. The film grossed $87,400,000 (USD worldwide), only $24 million less than Connery’s previous offering. With inflation taken into account, the film outgrosssed three of Roger Moore’s Bond films as well as both of Timothy Dalton’s films. It also outgrossed Connery’s unofficial 1983 Bond film Never Say Never Again.

That from Wikipedia.

Personally, I do find it to be the best plot of the Bond series so far. It was touching and emotional and the ending was very sad. Watch the whole movie and you’ll probably agree that Connery would have been too rugged for this role and that Roger Moore probably would have cocked it up completely. If there had to be one Bond movie I had to recommend, despite its lack of action compared to the previous ones, the story will touch you. This film rocked.

Diamonds Are Forever (1971)

Rated: 6/10
If this title makes you think of Kanye West, you’re right to do so. His remake is based on the theme song of this particular film. Another tid-bit: if you are familiar with The Kids Next Door, you may recall two adult men speaking in a relatively low tone (Mr Wink and that other guy). These were most likely based on the henchmen in this film called Mr Wint and Mr Kidd.

The plot itself is OK for a Bond movie. Sadly it’s the last of the Connery movies, as he decides to resign in search of alternative roles in other movies. In this one, Bond gets his revenge for the events in the previous movie and tracks down a diamond smuggling ring in the process. This movie was pretty decent, except for one factor that ruins most of it: the bond girl is a total bimdo/ditz. This is in spite of the fact that the actress Jill St. John has an IQ of 162.

Live And Let Die (1973)

Rated: 5/10
Right off the bat, the theme song sucks ass. This is followed by a series of ‘Bond vs the Negroes’ fight scenes. There really isn’t much to say that this is the beginning of a long series of shitty Bond movies. The only real compensation for this movie is that Jane Seymour truly looks beautiful in this film.

Why do you hate Roger Moore so much, Kamizu? Why? Well, it’s primarily because compared to Connery and Brosnan, who have a somewhat refined upclass playboy kind of image, Moore is a manslut who has an unrealisitc knowledge for the most intricate things and is a total “himbo” when it comes to the simplest of technology. His films have the oddest coincidental conveniences and the women fall for him like flies, where Connery has obvious persuasive manners. If they uncensored the love scenes, it would be porn.

The Man With The Golden Gun (1974)

Rated: 2/10
Flop. Big flop. Monster flop. Flop. Plot? Professional assassin wants to kill Bond. That’s pretty much it. What I can’t believe is that they would dare add the midget from Fantasy Island to a plot that already involves a smooth talking man in white suits living on an island. What the fuck were they thinking? What could make it worse? Mr Moore of course. I could go on, but I think I’ve said enough.

The Spy Who Loved Me (1977)

Rated: 6/10
Less sucky than its predecessor, this movie is smut. In this movie Bond and a Russian agent work together to nail the bad guys. I don’t want to ruin the main twist to the plot, however weak it is or may be. You can cut the smutty chemistry with an imaginary butter knife. Why did I give it a 6 and not the 2 I would have given it? Simply because it features my favourite Bond villain of all time, who luckily for me is a recurring one: Jaws. I love Jaws. Pardon my leet but, “h3 15 teh k00ln3ss!!oneoneeleventwelve”. He is fun to watch and since it’s Roger Moore, I actually root for Jaws. The man is indestructible, even in fucking space. (see Moonraker, succeeds this movie).

These are the first 10 Bond movies. I have seen Moonraker, number 11 on the list, but since I’ve made quite a long journal already, I’ll wait until I’ve seen the rest to update my journal.

Continued here.